The Official Record in the Case of Leo Frank, September 1915 : Tom Watson, 1915, Watson's Magazine, Jeffersonian Publishing Company : Free Download & Streaming : Internet Archive

Watson's Magazine, September, 1915

'The Official Record in the Case of Leo M. Frank, Jew Pervert' is an expose, by Thomas Edward Watson, published within the September, 1915, issue of Watson's Magazine. Tom Watson's review of the case, is quite possibly, the best argued, and concisely reasoned, logical presentation of the facts, and evidence, proving Leo Frank murdered Mary Phagan, inside the National Pencil Company's second floor metal room. What makes this work so powerful, is Tom Watson proves Leo Frank's guilt, without using the testimony of the NPCo factory janitor James "Jim" Conley, the admitted Mary Phagan murder-accomplice-after-the-fact!

Watson's review of the trial evidence, and testimony, superbly debunks the position of Leo Frank's defenders (back then and now), who have for more than 100 years been arguing that without the testimony of Jim Conley, it would not have been possible to convict Leo Frank.

Find out inside this issue of Watson's Magazine, how Tom Watson solved the Mary Phagan murder mystery, using the witness testimony of Monteen Stover, and trial statement of Leo M. Frank. When Watson's arguments, are juxtaposed against all of the witness testimony, and evidence, presented at the Leo Frank trial, it is clearly evident, the truth of Leo Frank's guilt, was arrived at beyond a reasonable doubt.

Be sure to read the unabridged version of the official trial brief of evidence, 1913, and Tom Watson's interpretation of the August 18, 1913, Leo Frank trial statement, regarding an admission, that amounted to an inescapable murder trial confession, set against the back drop of forensic evidence, that linked together the murder of Mary Phagan with metal room.

Leo Frank's courtroom revelation was originally articulated by State's Prosecution attorneys Frank Arthur Hooper, and Hugh Dorsey, at the Leo Frank Trial in late August 1913 (see the closing arguments of prosecution lawyers in American State Trials Volume X 1918 by John D. Lawson LLD), but arguably Watson does a better job at articulating the evidence.

There are other works about the Leo Frank Case, written by Tom Watson, produced through his Jeffersonian Publishing Company, but his "Jew Pervert" magazine article stands out as the best example in all of his five major works arguing for Leo Frank's guilt.

Other insightful works on the Leo Frank affair include the following books, magazines, and newspapers listed below. If you read, and study these selected treatments carefully, you will be able to solve the mystery of who murdered Mary Phagan, and be able to put into perspective, the century long Jewish-Gentile conflict, that has been inspired by Hollywood spin doctors and Leo Frank partisans for more than a century.

More excellent books and reading on the subject include:

0. The Leo Frank Case (Mary Phagan) Inside Story of Georgia's Greatest Murder Mystery 1913 - The first neutral book written on the subject. Very interesting read.

1. The Murder of Little Mary Phagan by Mary Phagan Kean (Available here on www.Archive.org). Written by Mary Phagan Kean, the great grand niece of Mary Phagan. A neutral account of the events surrounding the trial of Leo Frank. The Murder of Little Mary Phagan is well worth reading and it is a refreshing change from the endless number of Jewish and contemporary books turning the Leo Frank case into a neurotic race obsessed tabloid controversy.

2. American State Trials, volume X (1918) by John Lawson (Available here on www.Archive.org and LeoFrank.org) Tends to be biased in favor of Leo Frank and his legal defense team, this document provides an abridged version of the Brief of Evidence, leaving out some important things said and details when it republishes parts of the trial testimony. Be sure to read the closing arguments of Luther Zeigler Rosser, Reuben Rose Arnold, Frank Arthur Hooper and Hugh Manson Dorsey. For a more complete version of the Leo M. Frank trial testimony, read the 1913 murder trial brief of evidence found on www.LeoFrank.org and you can see what was left out.

3. Argument of Hugh M. Dorsey in the Trial of Leo Frank (Available here on www.archive.org and www.LeoFrank.org). Some but not all of the 9 hours of arguments given to the Jury at the end of the Leo Frank trial. Only 18 Libraries in the world have copies of this books. It can be found here on archive.org thanks to leofrank.org. This is an excellent book and required reading to see how Dorsey in sales vernacular 'closed' a Jury of 12 men and Judge Roan.

4. Leo M. Frank, Plaintiff in Error, vs. State of Georgia, Defendant in Error. In Error from Fulton Superior Court at the July Term 1913, Brief of Evidence. Extremely rare, only 1 copy exists, and it is at the Georgia State Archive. This document is available now on LeoFrank.org.

Three Major Atlanta Dailies: The Atlanta Constitution, The Atlanta Journal, The Atlanta Georgian (Hearst's Tabloid Yellow Journalism), The most relevant issues center around April 28th to August 27th 1913.

5. Atlanta Constitution Newspaper: The Murder of Mary Phagan, Coroner's Inquest, Grand Jury, Investigation, Trail, Appeals, Shanking and Lynching of Leo Frank Case in the Atlanta Constitution Newspaper from 1913 to 1915. http://archive.org/details/LeoFrankCaseInTheAtlantaConstitutionNewspaper1913To1915

6. Atlanta Georgian newspaper covering the Leo Frank Case from April though August, 1913. http://archive.org/details/AtlantaGeorgianNewspaperAprilToAugust1913

7. Atlanta Journal Newspaper, April, 28, 1913, through till the end of August, 1913, pertaining to the Leo Frank Case: http://archive.org/details/AtlantaJournalApril281913toAugust311913

Leo Frank confirms he might have been in the bathroom at the time Monteen Stover said his office was empty: See the Atlanta Constitution, Monday, March 9, 1914, Leo Frank Jailhouse Interview

Tom Watson

8. Tom Watson's Jeffersonian Newspaper (1914, 1915, 1916 and 1917) and Watson's Magazine: Watson's Magazine, January 1915, Watson's Magazine, March 1915; Watson's Magazine, August 1915, Watson's Magazine, September 1915, and Watson's Magazine, October of 1915. (Available here on www.Archive.org). Tom Watson's best work on the Leo M. Frank case was published in August and September 1915. Watson's five major magazine works written collectively on the Leo M. Frank topic, provide logical arguments confirming the guilt of Leo M. Frank with the superb reasoning of a genius lawyer.

These five 1915 works are absolutely required reading for anyone interested in the Leo M. Frank Case. Tom Watson's magazine publications surged from 30,000 to 100,000 copies, when it was announced he would be writing on the Leo Frank case. These magazines are extremely rare and very difficult to find. However they have been scanned and are available on both www.Archive.org and www.leofrank.org

8.1. The Leo Frank Case By Tom Watson (January 1915) Watson's Magazine Volume 20 No. 3. See page 139 for the Leo Frank Case. Jeffersonian Publishing Company, Thomson, Ga., Digital Source Archive.org

8.2. The Full Review of the Leo Frank Case By Tom Watson (March 1915) Volume 20. No. 5. See page 235 for 'A Full Review of the Leo Frank Case'. Jeffersonian Publishing Company, Thomson, Ga., Digital Source Archive.org

8.3. The Celebrated Case of The State of Georgia vs. Leo Frank By Tom Watson (August 1915) Volumne 21, No 4. See page 182 for 'The Celebrated Case of the State of Georgia vs. Leo Frank". Jeffersonian Publishing Company, Thomson, Ga., Digital Source Archive.org

8.4. The Official Record in the Case of Leo Frank, Jew Pervert By Tom Watson (September 1915) Volume 21. No. 5. See page 251 for 'The Official Record in the Case of Leo Frank, Jew Pervert'. Jeffersonian Publishing Company, Thomson, Ga., Digital Source Archive.org

8.5. The Rich Jews Indict a State! The Whole South Traduced in the Matter of Leo Frank By Tom Watson (October 1915) Volume 21. No. 6. See page 301. Jeffersonian Publishing Company, Thomson, Ga., Digital Source: Archive.org

Tom Watson's Jeffersonian Newspaper

9. The Tom E. Watson Digital Papers Archive, the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill: http://www.lib.unc.edu/dc/watson

There are Leo Frank cult members posing as neutral reviewers who do not want you to read Tom Watson's five 1915 magazine works on the Leo Frank trial, read them and find out why! They are the controversial forbidden fruit of truth in the Leo M. Frank case that have been censored for more than 100 years.

Be sure to also read Watson's Jeffersonian Newspapers on the Leo M. Frank case.

Tom Watson Brown, Grandson of Thomas Edward Watson

10. Notes on the Case of Leo M. Frank, By Tom W. Brown, Emery University, Atlanta, Georgia, 1982.

Leo Frank Case Research Portal

11. The Leo Frank Library: http://www.LeoFrank.org

Georgia Supreme Court Records of the Leo Frank Case (1913, 1914):

12. Leo Frank Trial and Appeals Georgia Supreme Court File (Spanning 1913 to 1914, 1,800+ pages). http://archive.org/details/leo-frank-georgia-supreme-court-case-records-1913-1914

Write a review
Downloaded 360 times Reviews
Average Rating:

Reviewer: Macro Man -

- October 27, 2012
Subject: is the verdict of guilt correct?
I wish Watson would have been on the State's prosecution team. His genius intellect expressed in his arguments and invective would have convinced any sane jury to convict Leo Frank. God Bless Saint Mary Anne Phagan.

Reviewer: manhattansunrise -

- August 19, 2011
Subject: Tom Watson Solves the Murder of Mary Phagan Bringing Close to the Leo M. Frank Case
Tom Watson Solves the Murder of Mary Phagan and brings the Leo M. Frank cold case to a close in his best analysis of the trial, September, 1915.

Tom Watson was a controversial southern patriot, lawyer, politician and writer, who championed the poor and working class. He is hated by Jews because he exposed their genetically innate treacherous behavior to the masses of people, both black and white.

Members of the Leo Frank cult do not want you to read his writing, so they will use politically correct scare tactics using words like KKK and anti-semite to get you to pee pee and poo poo in your pants, but if you don't pee pee and poo poo in your pants because of those words you will read his works. If you do read his writings you will realize why Jews hate him so much, because Tom Watson made a complicated trial easy to understand.

Leo Frank did something no other pedophile murderer did in the history of the human race, he made a virtual murder confession during his trial.

To learn more about the August 18, 1913, Leo Frank murder confession read the final closing arguments of Hugh Dorsey and Frank Hooper in American State Trials Volume 10 from 1918, by John D. Lawson. There you will see how Dorsey and Hooper articulate the Leo Frank murder confession. Though Tom Watson, provides a much better interpretation of the August 18, 1913, Leo Frank murder confession in 1915.

When Frank told the jury he must have
been at the 2nd floor toilet during the
five minutes that Monteen waited in his
empty office 12:05 to 12:10, the jury
must have felt the cold chills run up
their spines, for the jury knew that Mary
had not "unconsciously" gone to the toilet,
at the same time Frank did!

What Leo M. Frank, the doomed man, and his
bewildered lawyers failed to see was this:

It was just as necessary for Leo Frank to
explain WHERE MARY WAS, while Monteen Stover
waited, as to explain HIS OWN DISAPPEARANCE,
at that fatal time between 12:05 and 12:10.

Frank's repeated statements entrapped himself
beyond escape. He said, again and again, that
Mary came next after Hattie Hall (who left at
noon), and Leo Frank did not mention seeing
Monteen Stover (who was in Frank's office from
12:05 to 12:10) coming at all. This proved to
the jury that he did not know of Monteen Stover's
coming.

And he would have known it, had he been in his
2nd floor office, when he said he was. Now,
as he had (in ignorance of Monteen's visit)
placed both Mary and himself in his office —
while Monteen waited — he had deliberately
and repeatedly lied as to Mary's whereabouts,
as well as his own. He might have "unconsciously"
gone to the toilet. Very well; but where
did Mary Phagan go people are asking?

Because Mary Phagan's hair, and her blood, and
the only possible explanation of the wounds —
the swollen eye in front, and the scalp cut on
the back of the head, ranging from down upward —
were all back there at the metal department,
where the toilet was Leo Frank entrapped himself.

Infatuated young degenerate! To
escape Monteen Stovers evidence, and to
explain his absence from his office, he
supposed himself to have gone, "un-
consciously," to the only place in his
business where there were damning evi-
dences of the crime in the 2nd floor
metal room.

Leo Frank confessed to murdering Mary Phagan on August 18, 1913 at his own murder trial.

Something no one has ever done in history.

see the closing arguments of prosecution lawyers in American State Trials Volume X 1918 by John D. Lawson LLD and then compare it with Leo Frank's trial statement about an "unconscious" bathroom visit.

Reviewer: holysmoke -

- April 24, 2011
Subject: Again, please consider the source - bigots always lie
As much as they try to portray Tom Watson's bigotry and outright lies as fact, the more I urge you to actually read his writings. They are laced with bigotry. How can they base their claims on Frank's guilt on a proven bigot, lyncher, anti-semite, racist?

Reviewer: woodycrest1000 -

- April 23, 2011
Subject: Please find out about what a bigot Watson was, and how he polluted this trial
It's really amazing that folks say Tom Watson's writing shows Leo Frank had a fair trial. I invite you all to look into those writings. They incited hatred, bullied witnesses, bullied jurors, led a bald, proudly anti-semitic charge to lynch Frank, called for the re-formation of the KKK....The credibility of the source matters.

Reviewer: Apiru-inhibitor -

- April 18, 2011
Subject: No yielding to Jewish/Psychopath Pressure
The magazine shows that Leo Frank was given a fair trial. Back in those days, they didn't take that kind of rubbish from these demons. Sadly, it is very different nowadays. Leo Frank got what he deserved and the ADL trying to pin the blame on a black guy just will not cut it.

Reviewer: anderson1000 -

- April 18, 2011
Subject: Please check out the biased source
Tom Watson was not an objective analyst. He was a bigot, a KKK supporter, anti-Catholic, and anti-semitic. Read some of his other writings on these subjects, but take some anti-nausea medicine first. He called for and then celebrated the lynching of Leo Frank. The NY Times at the time said he was responsible for the lynching. I have no idea why the guy who posted this material is all over this site on a crusade to champion Tom Watson, but the guy was a simply a bigot.

Reviewer: sarahcohen -

- December 19, 2010
Subject: Unrivaled Analysis of Trial Testimony
By far and away the best analysis of the Leo M. Frank trial testimony with an unashamed and rare wit and sarcasm. Not one single contemporary book can claim to offer a better scutiny of the testimony in the Leo M.Frank murder trial as Watson's September 1915 analysis.

Reviewer: micah6vs8 - - October 18, 2010
Subject: That is Quite a Title
Many in the Kaiser's Army were Jewish . Guess that didn't matter , even at this early point .

Identifier:	TheOfficialRecordInTheCaseOfLeoFrankJewPervertSeptember1915
Mediatype:	texts
Rights:	Not in copyright. Physical copies are extremely rare.
Identifier-access:	http://www.archive.org/details/TheOfficialRecordInTheCaseOfLeoFrankJewPervertSeptember1915
Identifier-ark:	ark:/13960/t6252c764
Ppi:	400
Ocr:	ABBYY FineReader 8.0

View the book

Resources

The Official Record in the Case of Leo Frank, September 1915 (September, 1915)

Description

Write a review
Downloaded 360 times Reviews
Average Rating:

Selected metadata

View the book

Resources

The Official Record in the Case of Leo Frank, September 1915 (September, 1915)

Description

Write a review Downloaded 360 times Reviews Average Rating:

Selected metadata

Write a review
Downloaded 360 times Reviews
Average Rating: